↓ Skip to main content

A methodology for projecting sparse populations and its application to remote Indigenous communities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geographical Systems, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A methodology for projecting sparse populations and its application to remote Indigenous communities
Published in
Journal of Geographical Systems, July 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10109-020-00329-z
Authors

Alfred Michael Dockery, Mark N. Harris, Nicholas Holyoak, Ranjodh B. Singh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#10,276,053
of 16,110,865 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geographical Systems
#57
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,237
of 300,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geographical Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,110,865 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them