↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013325.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mari Imamura, Neil W Scott, Sheila A Wallace, Joseph A Ogah, Abigail A Ford, Yann A Dubos, Miriam Brazzelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Other 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 86 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 92 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,764,712
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,455
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,979
of 427,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.