↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013325.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mari Imamura, Neil W Scott, Sheila A Wallace, Joseph A Ogah, Abigail A Ford, Yann A Dubos, Miriam Brazzelli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,145,102
of 17,383,690 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,835
of 11,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,017
of 300,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,383,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.