↓ Skip to main content

Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Public Health, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 590)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
270 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1067 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
Title
Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study
Published in
The Lancet Public Health, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30164-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Long H Nguyen, David A Drew, Mark S Graham, Amit D Joshi, Chuan-Guo Guo, Wenjie Ma, Raaj S Mehta, Erica T Warner, Daniel R Sikavi, Chun-Han Lo, Sohee Kwon, Mingyang Song, Lorelei A Mucci, Meir J Stampfer, Walter C Willett, A Heather Eliassen, Jaime E Hart, Jorge E Chavarro, Janet W Rich-Edwards, Richard Davies, Joan Capdevila, Karla A Lee, Mary Ni Lochlainn, Thomas Varsavsky, Carole H Sudre, M Jorge Cardoso, Jonathan Wolf, Tim D Spector, Sebastien Ourselin, Claire J Steves, Andrew T Chan, Christine M. Albert, Gabriella Andreotti, Bijal Bala, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Laura E. Beane-Freeman, John S. Brownstein, Fiona J. Bruinsma, Joe Coresh, Rui Costa, Annie N. Cowan, Anusila Deka, Sandra L. Deming-Halverson, Maria Elena Martinez, Michael E. Ernst, Jane C. Figueiredo, Pedro Fortuna, Paul W. Franks, Laura Beane Freeman, Christopher D. Gardner, Irene M. Ghobrial, Christopher A. Haiman, Janet E. Hall, Jae H. Kang, Brenda Kirpach, Karestan C. Koenen, Laura D. Kubzansky, James V. Lacey, Jr, Loic Le Marchand, Xihong Lin, Pam Lutsey, Catherine R. Marinac, Maria Elena Martinez, Roger L. Milne, Anne M. Murray, Denis Nash, Julie R. Palmer, Alpa V. Patel, Eric Pierce, McKaylee M. Robertson, Lynn Rosenberg, Dale P. Sandler, Shepherd H. Schurman, Kara Sewalk, Shreela V. Sharma, Christopher J. Sidey-Gibbons, Liz Slevin, Jordan W.. Smoller, Claire J. Steves, Maarit I. Tiirikainen, Scott T. Weiss, Lynne R. Wilkens, Feng Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,067 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 358 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Other 38 11%
Unspecified 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Other 112 31%
Unknown 67 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 10%
Unspecified 28 8%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 4%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 83 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2875. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#834
of 16,093,309 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Public Health
#3
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128
of 300,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Public Health
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,093,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 143.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.