↓ Skip to main content

A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Bölenius, Christine Brulin, Kjell Grankvist, Marie Lindkvist, Johan Söderberg

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,032,138
of 15,936,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#920
of 3,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,108
of 293,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,936,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them