↓ Skip to main content

Medicine, morality and health care social media

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
225 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medicine, morality and health care social media
Published in
BMC Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farris K Timimi

Abstract

Social media includes many different forms of technology including online forums, blogs, microblogs (i.e. Twitter), wikipedias, video blogs, social networks and podcasting. The use of social media has grown exponentially and time spent on social media sites now represents one in five minutes spent online. Concomitant with this online growth, there has been an inverse trajectory in direct face-to-face patient-provider moments, which continue to become scarcer across the spectrum of health care. In contrast to standard forms of engagement and education, social media has advantages to include profound reach, immediate availability, an archived presence and broad accessibility. Our opportunity as health care providers to partner with our patients has never been greater, yet all too often we allow risk averse fears to limit our ability to truly leverage our good content effectively to the online community. This risk averse behavior truly limits our capacity to effectively engage our patients where they are--online.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 225 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 90 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 25%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Computer Science 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 14 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#102,209
of 16,027,623 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#96
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#554
of 129,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,027,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them