↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012022.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Kreuzberger, Johanna AAG Damen, Marialena Trivella, Lise J Estcourt, Angela Aldin, Lisa Umlauff, Maria DLA Vazquez-Montes, Robert Wolff, Karel GM Moons, Ina Monsef, Farid Foroutan, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Nicole Skoetz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 41 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Unspecified 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 41 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,788,976
of 21,298,337 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,466
of 12,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,367
of 311,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,298,337 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.