↓ Skip to main content

Is Nonconsensual Tapering of High-Dose Opioid Therapy Justifiable?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
252 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Nonconsensual Tapering of High-Dose Opioid Therapy Justifiable?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2020
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2020.651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Travis N Rieder

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 252 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Unspecified 3 20%
Social Sciences 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#245,798
of 26,729,497 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#66
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,319
of 430,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,729,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.