↓ Skip to main content

A systematic scoping review of ethical issues in mentoring in medical schools

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic scoping review of ethical issues in mentoring in medical schools
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12909-020-02169-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl Shumin Kow, Yao Hao Teo, Yao Neng Teo, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Nur Haidah Binte Ahmad Kamal, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Yun Ting Ong, Kuang Teck Tay, Min Chiam, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 32 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Psychology 6 9%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 33 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,563,552
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,087
of 3,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,275
of 404,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#21
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.