↓ Skip to main content

Pooled prevalence of deep vein thrombosis among coronavirus disease 2019 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Pooled prevalence of deep vein thrombosis among coronavirus disease 2019 patients
Published in
Critical Care, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03181-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Wang, Li Shi, Haiyan Yang, Guangcai Duan, Yadong Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 8 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,739,625
of 18,476,586 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,621
of 5,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,958
of 304,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,476,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them