↓ Skip to main content

Social, psychological, and environmental-structural factors determine consistent condom use among rural-to-urban migrant female sex workers in Shanghai China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social, psychological, and environmental-structural factors determine consistent condom use among rural-to-urban migrant female sex workers in Shanghai China
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiuxia Ye, Meili Shang, Tian Shen, Bei Pei, Xueqin Jiang, Yong Cai

Abstract

To determine potential social, psychological, and environmental-structural factors that may result in motivating female sex workers (FSWs), who are rural-to-urban migrants, and their paying partners in Shanghai, China to promote consistent condom use (CCU).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Social Sciences 12 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Psychology 6 9%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2012.
All research outputs
#6,983,526
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,449
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,877
of 122,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#70
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.