↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility and replicability: opportunities and challenges for geospatial research

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Geographical Information Science, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducibility and replicability: opportunities and challenges for geospatial research
Published in
International Journal of Geographical Information Science, August 2020
DOI 10.1080/13658816.2020.1802032
Authors

Peter Kedron, Wenwen Li, Stewart Fotheringham, Michael Goodchild

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,745,767
of 15,788,072 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Geographical Information Science
#148
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,180
of 249,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Geographical Information Science
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,788,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.