↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing hamstring injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing hamstring injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006782.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliott F Goldman, Diana E Jones

Abstract

Some sports, such as football, have a high incidence of hamstring injuries. Various interventions targeting the prevention of such injuries are in common use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Sweden 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 31 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 170%
Student > Bachelor 54 135%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 63%
Researcher 24 60%
Student > Postgraduate 21 53%
Other 53 133%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 320%
Sports and Recreations 33 83%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 70%
Social Sciences 12 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 30%
Other 22 55%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,069,299
of 13,613,268 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,222
of 10,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,483
of 122,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,613,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.