You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Specialist nurses in diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003286 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Loveman, Pamela Royle, Norman Waugh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Peru | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 282 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 81 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 92 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,698,013
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,319
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,978
of 62,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.