↓ Skip to main content

Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to fat‐free yogurts and fermented milks complying with the specifications “fat free”, “low in sugars”, “high protein”, “source of…

Overview of attention for article published in EFSA Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to fat‐free yogurts and fermented milks complying with the specifications “fat free”, “low in sugars”, “high protein”, “source of calcium” and “source of vitamin D” for nutrition claims and reduction of body and visceral fat while maintaining lean body mass in the context of an energy‐restricted diet pursuant to Article 13.5 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
Published in
EFSA Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3948
Authors

Nutrition and Allergies EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,484,899
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from EFSA Journal
#1,989
of 4,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,607
of 352,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EFSA Journal
#79
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.