↓ Skip to main content

Interprofessional education through shadowing experiences in multi-disciplinary clinical settings

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interprofessional education through shadowing experiences in multi-disciplinary clinical settings
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-18-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

John J Riva, Jessica MS Lam, Elizabeth C Stanford, Ainsley E Moore, Andrea R Endicott, Iris E Krawchenko

Abstract

The World Health Organization has recently added Interprofessional Education (IPE) to its global health agenda recognizing it as a necessary component of all health professionals' education. We suggest mandatory interprofessional shadowing experiences as a mechanism to be used by chiropractic institutions to address this agenda. IPE initiatives of other professions (pharmacy and medicine) are described along with chiropractic. This relative comparison of professions local to our jurisdiction in Ontario, Canada is made so that the chiropractic profession may take note that they are behind other health care providers in implementing IPE.Interprofessional shadowing experiences would likely take place in a multi-disciplinary clinical setting. We offer an example of how two separate professions within a Family Health Team (FHT) can work together in such a setting to enhance both student learning and patient care. For adult learners, using interprofessional shadowing experiences with learner-derived and active objectives across diverse health professional groups may help to improve the educational experience. Mandatory interprofessional shadowing experiences for chiropractors during their training can enhance future collaborative practice and provide success in reaching a goal common to each profession - improved patient care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 19 27%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Psychology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 19%