↓ Skip to main content

The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-20-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Millan, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Brian Budgell, Martin Descarreaux, Michel-Ange Amorim

Abstract

Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been shown to have an effect on spine-related pain, both clinically and in experimentally induced pain. However, it is unclear if it has an immediate noticeable biomechanical effect on spinal motion that can be measured in terms of an increased range of motion (ROM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 26%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 19%
Sports and Recreations 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 35 22%