↓ Skip to main content

Peptide sequences from the first Castoroides ohioensis skull and the utility of old museum collections for palaeoproteomics

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Peptide sequences from the first Castoroides ohioensis skull and the utility of old museum collections for palaeoproteomics
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2016
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.0593
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy P. Cleland, Elena R. Schroeter, Robert S. Feranec, Deepak Vashishth

Abstract

Vertebrate fossils have been collected for hundreds of years and are stored in museum collections around the world. These remains provide a readily available resource to search for preserved proteins; however, the vast majority of palaeoproteomic studies have focused on relatively recently collected bones with a well-known handling history. Here, we characterize proteins from the nasal turbinates of the first Castoroides ohioensis skull ever discovered. Collected in 1845, this is the oldest museum-curated specimen characterized using palaeoproteomic tools. Our mass spectrometry analysis detected many collagen I peptides, a peptide from haemoglobin beta, and in vivo and diagenetic post-translational modifications. Additionally, the identified collagen I sequences provide enough resolution to place C. ohioensis within Rodentia. This study illustrates the utility of archived museum specimens for both the recovery of preserved proteins and phylogenetic analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 21%
Chemistry 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2020.
All research outputs
#963,305
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,282
of 11,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,313
of 368,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#42
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.