↓ Skip to main content

Time to get personal? The impact of researchers choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychosomatic Research, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 2,157)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
108 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time to get personal? The impact of researchers choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology
Published in
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, October 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110211
Authors

Jojanneke A. Bastiaansen, Yoram K. Kunkels, Frank J. Blaauw, Steven M. Boker, Eva Ceulemans, Meng Chen, Sy-Miin Chow, Peter de Jonge, Ando C. Emerencia, Sacha Epskamp, Aaron J. Fisher, Ellen L. Hamaker, Peter Kuppens, Wolfgang Lutz, M. Joseph Meyer, Robert Moulder, Zita Oravecz, Harriëtte Riese, Julian Rubel, Oisín Ryan, Michelle N. Servaas, Gustav Sjobeck, Evelien Snippe, Timothy J. Trull, Wolfgang Tschacher, Date C. van der Veen, Marieke Wichers, Phillip K. Wood, William C. Woods, Aidan G.C. Wright, Casper J. Albers, Laura F. Bringmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 34%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 62%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 10 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#335,530
of 16,514,094 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#28
of 2,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,356
of 300,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,514,094 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.