↓ Skip to main content

Are preferences for city attributes heterogeneous? An assessment using a discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Papers in Regional Science, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are preferences for city attributes heterogeneous? An assessment using a discrete choice experiment
Published in
Papers in Regional Science, August 2020
DOI 10.1111/pirs.12566
Authors

Diana Romero‐Espinosa, Mauricio Sarrias, Ricardo Daziano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,027,505
of 15,799,327 outputs
Outputs from Papers in Regional Science
#55
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,369
of 250,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Papers in Regional Science
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,799,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.