↓ Skip to main content

Scaling-up nature-based solutions. Lessons from the Living Melbourne strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Geoforum, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scaling-up nature-based solutions. Lessons from the Living Melbourne strategy
Published in
Geoforum, November 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.011
Authors

Sebastian Fastenrath, Judy Bush, Lars Coenen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 35%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,152,214
of 16,250,634 outputs
Outputs from Geoforum
#144
of 1,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,868
of 301,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoforum
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,250,634 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.