| Title |
Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m3026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trisha Greenhalgh, Matthew Knight, Christine A’Court, Maria Buxton, Laiba Husain |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7,311 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1216 | 17% |
| United States | 601 | 8% |
| Mexico | 356 | 5% |
| Spain | 286 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 154 | 2% |
| Canada | 137 | 2% |
| Australia | 109 | 1% |
| India | 93 | 1% |
| Ireland | 83 | 1% |
| Other | 964 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3312 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5623 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 904 | 12% |
| Scientists | 627 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 149 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2255 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 260 | 12% |
| Researcher | 232 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 214 | 9% |
| Other | 158 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 140 | 6% |
| Other | 423 | 19% |
| Unknown | 828 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 654 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 199 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 83 | 4% |
| Psychology | 57 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 50 | 2% |
| Other | 286 | 13% |
| Unknown | 926 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5949. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#570
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#14
of 63,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 403,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#3
of 785 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 785 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.