You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Fossil Energy Use, Climate Change Impacts, and Air Quality-Related Human Health Damages of Conventional and Diversified Cropping Systems in Iowa, USA
Environmental Science & Technology, August 2020
Natalie D. Hunt, Matt Liebman, Sumil K. Thakrar, Jason D. Hill
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||71||79%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||4||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||12||11%|
|Student > Master||10||9%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||6%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||5||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||20||18%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
of 20,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 404,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.