You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Global and Arctic effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic gases and aerosols in MRI-ESM2.0
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2020
Naga Oshima, Seiji Yukimoto, Makoto Deushi, Tsuyoshi Koshiro, Hideaki Kawai, Taichu Y. Tanaka, Kohei Yoshida
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||71%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||29%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||14%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||4%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||16||32%|
|Physics and Astronomy||2||4%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 397,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.