↓ Skip to main content

Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005996.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolien M. Boomsma, Stephen D Keay, Nick S Macklon

Abstract

In order to improve embryo implantation for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles the use of glucocorticoids has been advocated. It has been proposed that glucocorticoids may improve the intrauterine environment by acting as immunomodulators to reduce the uterine natural killer (NK) cell count and normalise the cytokine expression profile in the endometrium and by suppression of endometrial inflammation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Other 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 19 27%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Psychology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2016.
All research outputs
#272,245
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#731
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,115
of 121,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.