| Title |
Intersectionality of Gender and Visible Minority Status Among General Surgery Residents in Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Surgery, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2828 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentin Mocanu, Tanya M. Kuper, Wanda Marini, Chadey Assane, Kristin M. DeGirolamo, Kamran Fathimani, Nancy N. Baxter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 24 | 24% |
| United States | 21 | 21% |
| Australia | 8 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 36 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 22% |
| Scientists | 18 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#596,199
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#597
of 5,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,797
of 441,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#18
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.