↓ Skip to main content

A methodological review of resilience measurement scales

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 2,327)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
22 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1446 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2432 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A methodological review of resilience measurement scales
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-9-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Windle, Kate M Bennett, Jane Noyes

Abstract

The evaluation of interventions and policies designed to promote resilience, and research to understand the determinants and associations, require reliable and valid measures to ensure data quality. This paper systematically reviews the psychometric rigour of resilience measurement scales developed for use in general and clinical populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 2373 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 404 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 400 16%
Researcher 246 10%
Student > Bachelor 220 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 199 8%
Other 467 19%
Unknown 496 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 768 32%
Social Sciences 292 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 255 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 112 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 104 4%
Other 326 13%
Unknown 575 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#630,103
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#15
of 2,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,701
of 200,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them