↓ Skip to main content

Modeling Marsh‐Forest Boundary Transgression in Response to Storms and Sea‐Level Rise

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling Marsh‐Forest Boundary Transgression in Response to Storms and Sea‐Level Rise
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, September 2020
DOI 10.1029/2020gl088998
Authors

J. Carr, G. Guntenspergen, M. Kirwan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 26%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,272,581
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#5,787
of 19,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,461
of 399,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#167
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.