4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter: 4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 25 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 4 X posts from 4 X users, with an upper bound of 19,751 followers.

RT @journalofCMR: 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy sub…

15 Aug 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @journalofCMR: 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy sub…

14 Aug 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @journalofCMR: 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy sub…

14 Aug 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study https://t.co/N6Ermfi0O1

14 Aug 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity.