Title |
The complex relationship between personal sense of connection to animals and self‐reported proenvironmental behaviors by zoo visitors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12780 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alejandro Grajal, Jerry F. Luebke, Lisa‐Anne DeGregoria Kelly, Jennifer Matiasek, Susan Clayton, Bryan T. Karazsia, Carol D. Saunders, Susan R. Goldman, Michael E. Mann, Ricardo Stanoss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 18% |
United States | 5 | 18% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
Scientists | 7 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
Researcher | 22 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 42 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 21% |
Environmental Science | 27 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 14% |
Psychology | 23 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 10% |
Unknown | 46 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,124,486
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,159
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,522
of 425,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#21
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.