↓ Skip to main content

Disparities in Incidence of COVID-19 Among Underrepresented Racial/Ethnic Groups in Counties Identified as Hotspots During June 5–18, 2020 — 22 States, February–June 2020

Overview of attention for article published in MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
116 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
107 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
325 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Disparities in Incidence of COVID-19 Among Underrepresented Racial/Ethnic Groups in Counties Identified as Hotspots During June 5–18, 2020 — 22 States, February–June 2020
Published in
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, August 2020
DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6933e1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jazmyn T. Moore, Jessica N. Ricaldi, Charles E. Rose, Jennifer Fuld, Monica Parise, Gloria J. Kang, Anne K. Driscoll, Tina Norris, Nana Wilson, Gabriel Rainisch, Eduardo Valverde, Vladislav Beresovsky, Christine Agnew Brune, Nadia L. Oussayef, Dale A. Rose, Laura E. Adams, Sindoos Awel, Julie Villanueva, Dana Meaney-Delman, Margaret A. Honein, Gregory Bautista, Janet Cowins, Charles Edge, Gail Grant, Robbie Gray, Sean Griffing, Nikki Hayes, Laura Hughes, Rene Lavinghouze, Sarah Leonard, Robert Montierth, Krishna Palipudi, Victoria Rayle, Andrew Ruiz, Malaika Washington, Sherri Davidson, Jennifer Dillaha, Rachel Herlihy, Carina Blackmore, Thomas Troelstrup, Laura Edison, Ebony Thomas, Caitlin Pedati, Farah Ahmed, Catherine Brown, Sarah Lyon Callo, Kathryn Como-Sabetti, Paul Byers, Victor Sutton, Zackary Moore, Sietske de Fijter, Alexia Zhang, Linda Bell, John Dunn, Stephen Pont, Keegan McCaffrey, Emily Stephens, Ryan Westergaard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Master 36 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 85 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 17%
Social Sciences 34 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 106 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1029. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,702
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#344
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#704
of 426,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#24
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 336.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.