↓ Skip to main content

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012250
Authors

Muhammed Zaki Shaik, Sumayyah Ebrahim, Tamara Kredo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Unspecified 4 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 3 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,562,082
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,098
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,956
of 272,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.