Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016

Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter: 2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 20 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 3 X posts from 2 X users, with an upper bound of 1,668 followers.

RT @CochraneUrology: Protocol for NMA for "minimal-invasive" treatments for male LUTS due to BPH just published. NHS-funded priority review…

24 Jun 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

Protocol for NMA for "minimal-invasive" treatments for male LUTS due to BPH just published. NHS-funded priority review; comments welcome. Hope to complete before end of year. https://t.co/PiWR9TEWPY @AmerUrological @mborofsk @juan_francomd

24 Jun 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

@sacochrane @tamarakredo Check out Cochrane Urology's new protocol: Circumcision devices v standard surgical tech https://t.co/zZgiC7i9sL

17 Jun 2016

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity.