↓ Skip to main content

Clinically significant bleeding in incurable cancer patients: effectiveness of hemostatic radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinically significant bleeding in incurable cancer patients: effectiveness of hemostatic radiotherapy
Published in
Radiation Oncology, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-7-132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikola Cihoric, Susanne Crowe, Steffen Eychmüller, Daniel M Aebersold, Pirus Ghadjar

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the outcome after hemostatic radiotherapy (RT) of significant bleeding in incurable cancer patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Czechia 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 29%
Other 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Psychology 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,536,283
of 14,282,317 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#370
of 1,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,381
of 125,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,282,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,480 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them