↓ Skip to main content

Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as (statistically) expected

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
24 tweeters
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as (statistically) expected
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/2016jb012818
Authors

Nicholas J. van der Elst, Morgan T. Page, Deborah A. Weiser, Thomas H.W. Goebel, S. Mehran Hosseini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 30%
Researcher 30 28%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 59 55%
Engineering 18 17%
Energy 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#736,719
of 19,914,721 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#86
of 2,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,298
of 274,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#3
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,914,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.