| Title |
Effects of a major deletion in the SARS-CoV-2 genome on the severity of infection and the inflammatory response: an observational cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31757-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barnaby E Young, Siew-Wai Fong, Yi-Hao Chan, Tze-Minn Mak, Li Wei Ang, Danielle E Anderson, Cheryl Yi-Pin Lee, Siti Naqiah Amrun, Bernett Lee, Yun Shan Goh, Yvonne C F Su, Wycliffe E Wei, Shirin Kalimuddin, Louis Yi Ann Chai, Surinder Pada, Seow Yen Tan, Louisa Sun, Purnima Parthasarathy, Yuan Yi Constance Chen, Timothy Barkham, Raymond Tzer Pin Lin, Sebastian Maurer-Stroh, Yee-Sin Leo, Lin-Fa Wang, Laurent Renia, Vernon J Lee, Gavin J D Smith, David Chien Lye, Lisa F P Ng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,668 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 518 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 369 | 8% |
| Spain | 323 | 7% |
| France | 159 | 3% |
| Canada | 79 | 2% |
| Japan | 53 | 1% |
| Australia | 50 | 1% |
| Germany | 48 | 1% |
| Turkey | 41 | <1% |
| Other | 573 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2455 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3984 | 85% |
| Scientists | 423 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 199 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 59 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 497 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 497 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 71 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 95 | 19% |
| Unknown | 161 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 92 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 26 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 70 | 14% |
| Unknown | 175 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3943. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,279
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#92
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80
of 427,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#9
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.