| Title |
The downstream consequences of long waits: How lines at the precinct depress future turnout
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Electoral Studies, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Pettigrew |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 352 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 168 | 48% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Chile | 6 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 273 | 78% |
| Scientists | 60 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 33% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 678. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#31,636
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Electoral Studies
#3
of 1,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,262
of 427,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electoral Studies
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.