↓ Skip to main content

Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007352.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Hardman, Neil Sharma, Joel Smith, Paul Nankivell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Unspecified 3 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#10,119,286
of 15,882,642 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,661
of 11,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,095
of 228,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,882,642 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.