↓ Skip to main content

Familial chromosomal translocation X; 22 associated with infertility and recurrent X mosaicism

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Familial chromosomal translocation X; 22 associated with infertility and recurrent X mosaicism
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13039-016-0249-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana Dourado Grzesiuk, Ciro Silveira Pereira, Carlos Henrique Paiva Grangeiro, Clarissa Gondim Picanço-Albuquerque, Flávia Gaona Oliveira-Gennaro, Filipe Brum Machado, Enrique Medina-Acosta, Ester Silveira Ramos, Maisa Yoshimoto, Lucia Martelli

Abstract

Individuals with apparently balanced translocations, often, show no clinical findings. However, in meiosis, translocations tend to cause errors on chromosome disjunction and the ones involving sex chromosomes have particular implications for the phenotype. Male carriers of balanced X-autosome translocations are almost invariably infertile due to interruption of the spermatogenesis, but the mechanism is not fully understood. In this case report, we performed a combination of classical cytogenetics (G-banding), molecular cytogenetics (fluorescence in situ hybridization and X-chromosome inactivation study), and cytogenomics (microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization) techniques for characterization of an inherited (X;22) translocation in a family originally referred for infertility investigation. Both proband and his sister are infertile and present the maternally inherited translocation. Interestingly, the maternal grandmother was mosaic for X chromosome monosomy suggesting that the t(X;22) in the proband's mother arose by errors at oogenesis. The presence of the same mosaicism of the X chromosome in the proband's aunt is consistent with this consideration. Array- CGH analysis showed no constitutional pathogenic gains or losses in the translocation carriers. The X-chromosome inactivation studies revealed that the translocated X;22 was active in 99.3% of cells in the mother and in 88% of cells in the daughter. We suggest that incomplete skewing of X inactivation (>97 %) of the daughter could justify the infertility. This study is the first description of recurrent mosaicism of the X chromosome associated with a familial X-autosome translocation. The phenotype of infertility was probably caused by disruption of spermatogenesis due to gametogenesis specific errors resulted from meiotic pairing and segregation anomalies on the translocated chromosomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Tunisia 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#251
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,111
of 367,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.