You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00604-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaojia Chen, Zhang Zhang, Huijie Yang, Peishan Qiu, Haizhou Wang, Fan Wang, Qiu Zhao, Jun Fang, Jiayan Nie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 20% |
| Turkey | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 28% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 608 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 8% |
| Researcher | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 76 | 13% |
| Unknown | 299 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 79 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 65 | 11% |
| Unknown | 315 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 531. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#47,413
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,762
of 427,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.