You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-020-1280-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malte Jochum, Markus Fischer, Forest Isbell, Christiane Roscher, Fons van der Plas, Steffen Boch, Gerhard Boenisch, Nina Buchmann, Jane A. Catford, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Anne Ebeling, Nico Eisenhauer, Gerd Gleixner, Norbert Hölzel, Jens Kattge, Valentin H. Klaus, Till Kleinebecker, Markus Lange, Gaëtane Le Provost, Sebastian T. Meyer, Rafael Molina-Venegas, Liesje Mommer, Yvonne Oelmann, Caterina Penone, Daniel Prati, Peter B. Reich, Abiel Rindisbacher, Deborah Schäfer, Stefan Scheu, Bernhard Schmid, David Tilman, Teja Tscharntke, Anja Vogel, Cameron Wagg, Alexandra Weigelt, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Wolfgang Wilcke, Peter Manning |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 17 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 9% |
| United States | 10 | 8% |
| Spain | 7 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 5% |
| France | 6 | 5% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 53% |
| Scientists | 56 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 337 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Professor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 77 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 113 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 75 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 100 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#182,141
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#363
of 2,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,694
of 426,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#14
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 148.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.