| Title |
US racial inequality may be as deadly as COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2014750117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Wrigley-Field |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,735 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 677 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 153 | 9% |
| Canada | 20 | 1% |
| Australia | 14 | <1% |
| Germany | 10 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 9 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Comoros | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 75 | 4% |
| Unknown | 757 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1257 | 72% |
| Scientists | 342 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 75 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 60 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 19% |
| Researcher | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 51 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1656. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,647
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#220
of 103,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#380
of 426,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9
of 1,088 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,088 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.