↓ Skip to main content

A Retrospective Biopharmaceutical Analysis of >800 Approved Oral Drug Products: Are Drug Properties of Solid Dispersions and Lipid-Based Formulations Distinctive?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Retrospective Biopharmaceutical Analysis of >800 Approved Oral Drug Products: Are Drug Properties of Solid Dispersions and Lipid-Based Formulations Distinctive?
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, November 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.08.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harriet Bennett-Lenane, Joseph P. O'Shea, Caitriona M. O'Driscoll, Brendan T. Griffin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Master 6 17%
Other 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 42%
Chemistry 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,777,753
of 19,148,527 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#1,638
of 5,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,698
of 309,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,148,527 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,667 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.