↓ Skip to main content

Identifying reliable indicators of fitness in polar bears

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying reliable indicators of fitness in polar bears
Published in
PLoS ONE, August 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0237444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karyn D. Rode, Todd C. Atwood, Gregory W. Thiemann, Michelle St. Martin, Ryan R. Wilson, George M. Durner, Eric V. Regehr, Sandra L. Talbot, George K. Sage, Anthony M. Pagano, Kristin S. Simac

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,986,900
of 15,922,938 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#78,117
of 157,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,469
of 240,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#134
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.