You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbiota Supplementation with Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus Modifies the Preterm Infant Gut Microbiota and Metabolome: An Observational Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports Medicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Alcon-Giner, Matthew J. Dalby, Shabhonam Caim, Jennifer Ketskemety, Alex Shaw, Kathleen Sim, Melissa A.E. Lawson, Raymond Kiu, Charlotte Leclaire, Lisa Chalklen, Magdalena Kujawska, Suparna Mitra, Fahmina Fardus-Reid, Gustav Belteki, Katherine McColl, Jonathan R. Swann, J. Simon Kroll, Paul Clarke, Lindsay J. Hall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 22% |
| United States | 25 | 17% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 49 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 46% |
| Scientists | 64 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 68 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 75 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#347,542
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports Medicine
#122
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,566
of 426,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports Medicine
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.