↓ Skip to main content

Ethical frameworks for quality improvement activities: an analysis of international practice

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Quality in Health Care, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethical frameworks for quality improvement activities: an analysis of international practice
Published in
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, August 2020
DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corina Naughton, Elaine Meehan, Elaine Lehane, Ciara Landers, Sarah Jane Flaherty, Aoife Lane, Margaret Landers, Caroline Kilty, Mohamad Saab, John Goodwin, Nuala Walshe, Teresa Wills, Vera Mccarthy, Siobhan Murphy, Joan Mccarthy, Helen Cummins, Deirdre Madden, Josephine Hegarty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 21%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 6 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#10,615,008
of 19,430,502 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#1,074
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,269
of 310,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,430,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.