You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recurrent R-spondin fusions in colon cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature11282 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Somasekar Seshagiri, Eric W. Stawiski, Steffen Durinck, Zora Modrusan, Elaine E. Storm, Caitlin B. Conboy, Subhra Chaudhuri, Yinghui Guan, Vasantharajan Janakiraman, Bijay S. Jaiswal, Joseph Guillory, Connie Ha, Gerrit J. P. Dijkgraaf, Jeremy Stinson, Florian Gnad, Melanie A. Huntley, Jeremiah D. Degenhardt, Peter M. Haverty, Richard Bourgon, Weiru Wang, Hartmut Koeppen, Robert Gentleman, Timothy K. Starr, Zemin Zhang, David A. Largaespada, Thomas D. Wu, Frederic J. de Sauvage |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| Comoros | 2 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 787 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| China | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 750 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 187 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 185 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 94 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 5% |
| Other | 114 | 14% |
| Unknown | 117 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 288 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 208 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 4% |
| Unknown | 133 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,434,631
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#37,636
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,374
of 190,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#507
of 983 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 983 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.