↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacotherapy for mild hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 8,583)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
224 tweeters
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacotherapy for mild hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006742.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diao D, Wright JM, Cundiff DK, Gueyffier F, Diana Diao, James M Wright, David K Cundiff, Francois Gueyffier, Diao, Diana, Wright, James M, Cundiff, David K, Gueyffier, Francois

Abstract

People with no previous cardiovascular events or cardiovascular disease represent a primary prevention population. The benefits and harms of treating mild hypertension in primary prevention patients are not known at present. This review examines the existing randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 224 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 304. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,064
of 8,336,644 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 8,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172
of 97,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,336,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.