↓ Skip to main content

The role of Transposable Elements in shaping the combinatorial interaction of Transcription Factors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of Transposable Elements in shaping the combinatorial interaction of Transcription Factors
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-400
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Testori, Livia Caizzi, Santina Cutrupi, Olivier Friard, Michele De Bortoli, Davide Cora', Michele Caselle

Abstract

In the last few years several studies have shown that Transposable Elements (TEs) in the human genome are significantly associated with Transcription Factor Binding Sites (TFBSs) and that in several cases their expansion within the genome led to a substantial rewiring of the regulatory network. Another important feature of the regulatory network which has been thoroughly studied is the combinatorial organization of transcriptional regulation. In this paper we combine these two observations and suggest that TEs, besides rewiring the network, also played a central role in the evolution of particular patterns of combinatorial gene regulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 16 19%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2012.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,391
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,087
of 174,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#86
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.