You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Particle-based, Pfs230 and Pfs25 immunization is effective, but not improved by duplexing at fixed total antigen dose
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03368-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei-Chiao Huang, Bingbing Deng, Moustafa T. Mabrouk, Amal Seffouh, Joaquin Ortega, Carole Long, Kazutoyo Miura, Yimin Wu, Jonathan F. Lovell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,409,217
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,344
of 5,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,614
of 399,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#70
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.