↓ Skip to main content

Axitinib and sorafenib are potent in tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Communication and Signaling, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,499)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Axitinib and sorafenib are potent in tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells
Published in
Cell Communication and Signaling, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12964-016-0129-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Halbach, Zehan Hu, Christine Gretzmeier, Julia Ellermann, Franziska U. Wöhrle, Jörn Dengjel, Tilman Brummer

Abstract

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is driven by the fusion kinase Bcr-Abl. Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib mesylate (IM), revolutionized CML therapy. Nevertheless, about 20 % of CMLs display primary or acquired TKI resistance. TKI resistance can be either caused by mutations within the Bcr-Abl kinase domain or by aberrant signaling by its effectors, e.g. Lyn or Gab2. Bcr-Abl mutations are frequently observed in TKI resistance and can only in some cases be overcome by second line TKIs. In addition, we have previously shown that the formation of Gab2 complexes can be regulated by Bcr-Abl and that Gab2 signaling counteracts the efficacy of four distinct Bcr-Abl inhibitors. Therefore, TKI resistance still represents a challenge for disease management and alternative therapies are urgently needed. Using different CML cell lines and models, we identified the clinically approved TKIs sorafenib (SF) and axitinib (AX) as drugs overcoming the resistance mediated by the Bcr Abl(T315I) mutant as well as the one mediated by Gab2 and Lyn(Y508F). In addition, we demonstrated that AX mainly affects the Bcr-Abl/Grb2/Gab2 axis, whereas SF seems to act independently of the fusion kinase and most likely by blocking signaling pathways up- and downstream of Gab2. We demonstrate that SF and AX show potency in various and mechanistically distinct scenarios of TKI resistance, including Bcr-Abl(T315I) as well as Lyn- and Gab2-mediated resistances. Our data invites for further evaluation und consideration of these inhibitors in the treatment of TKI resistant CML.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Psychology 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#702,933
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cell Communication and Signaling
#12
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,203
of 313,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Communication and Signaling
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them